Tag Archive: Hesiod_Theogony

Worth: how the Latins understood the notion of “truth”

Saturday, September 16, 2017
In the stories of old, the cosmos is different. In the stories of old, even Zeus (who is also called “Mind” by some) bends and acquiesces. Thetis is said to have forced a nod from Zeus by tugging on his chin. And Zeus is not immune to Aphrodite’s powers, nor is he above the appraisal of Hera or the judgments of the fates. The pantheon of polytheism requires a balance between powers which is not always found in the cultures with the tyrannical history of your typical kingship. These latter are the ones that are eventually overthrown — if not in name, then in actuality. What lasts is not a monotheism, but a polytheistic pantheonism. It is the way of Zeus, for he does not “rule” as a basileus, does but as a god does among fellow gods. That is aletheia, for whatever it’s “worth”.



Thursday, August 31, 2017.
What sums up this day?
That’s what I learned in Latin class yesterday.

A Home for Socrates

Wednesday , August 30, 2017 🌊
But if this is right, then this is still interesting — because if I were to want to realize a certain sort of theoretical world — namely, a world with an environment that would be more helpful/beneficial to a certain sort of subject, like a Socratic subject, a healthy subject — then, I suppose that the best way I could do that is by looking to that subject as my guide to building such a world. And, if I had such a desire/aim to build such a theoretical world, I think that my goal would be not to change my healthy subject, but simply to accommodate the world to my subject. I would want to realize a world in which whatever my healthy subject found pleasant, would be guaranteed to benefit her as well.

The Tears of Hades

Tuesday, August 29, 2017 🔥
I think that empathy involves actually relating another person’s current experience with one’s own past experience — and so ultimately, empathy reminds me of my own past experience and my own emotional response is regarding my own past experience and not the other person’s. On the other hand, sympathy is when I relate my past experiences to imagine what the other person is now experiencing. But in sympathizing, I am not now dwelling on my own past experiences as I am doing when I am empathizing. I simply use my past experiences to justify, support, or understand what the other person is now experiencing. And so, I think that this is the key difference between sympathy and empathy. [At least, in my experience, it is.]

A way of perceiving the world without prejudice

Sunday, August 13, 2017.🌞
According to Parmenides, it is the ideas and images in our mind-caves that “come-to-be” and “pass-away.” But these are illusions, and it only appears to us as if something were “coming-to-be” or “passing-away.” Nothing is really “coming-to-be” and “passing-away” out there in the world

Thinking outside of the box

Thursday, July 27, 2017.
Also interesting: for Descartians, it looks like the conditional statement is the Judeo-Christian God. If this is true, then believing in the conditional statement is what it is to believe in the Judeo-Christian God.
But why the Judeo-Christian God? What does Hesiod’s genealogy and Parmenides’ method have to do with Judaism and/or Christianity? Why can’t you believe in Hesiod and Parmenides — or a conclusion of Euler diagrams, or Euthyphro’s polytheistic view, for that matter — instead of the Judeo-Christian God?


Monday, June 12, 2017.
And so, it is this fact that Socrates knows that he knows no-thing that proves that Socrates’ questions are necessarily sincere. That is, they are not rhetorical questions. They’re very genuinely questions.